ARMIDALE TEAMS - MATCH 6
Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 100
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 WILKS Team 3 CAMPBELL Team 5 
W9 200 3 -3 2 BOKOR Team 14 SMITH Team 4 W9 100 6 -6 3 CAMPBELL Team 1 WILKS Team 5 
W10 100 -3 3 4 MCIVOR Team 12 NELSON Team 2 W9 110 -14 14 5 BINGHAM Team 16 SHEEAN Team 3 W8 100 -10 10 6 GAVEL Team 9 BRETTELL Team 4 
X S10 590 12 -12 7 THOMSON Team 13 HOULTON Team 5 S8 150 0 0 8 TREHY Team 11 ATCHISON Team 4 
E8 200 2 -2 9 BRETTELL Team 6 GAVEL Team 2 W10 130 -12 12 10 MCBAIN Team 17 JUNGE Team 2 S8 110 -3 3 11 ATCHISON Team 8 TREHY Team 3 S9 140 -2 2 12 NELSON Team 4 MCIVOR Team 6 X W9 800 14 -14 13 HOULTON Team 7 THOMSON Team 4 S7 150 0 0 14 SMITH Team 2 BOKOR Team 4 E10 130 -6 6 15 PRICE Team 18 WILLCOCKS Team 6 E9 300 14 -14 16 SHEEAN Team 5 BINGHAM Team 3 X S9 530 10 -10 17 JUNGE Team 10 MCBAIN Team 4NT E 8 200 3 -3 18 WILLCOCKS Team 15 PRICE Team 5 E12 620 -14 14
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 6X by EW | -3 | 800 | 1 |
| 4X by NS | = | 590 | 1 |
| 3X by NS | = | 530 | 1 |
| 6 by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 4NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | = | 140 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 110 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -110 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | = | -130 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +2 | -130 | 1 |
| 5 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
| 4 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | +1 | -620 | 1 |