NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 2
Board No: 12
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: -40
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
7 MIDGLEY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 3 S AS 6 300 -9 9 6 MCDONALD Team 4 PERRY Team 3 N KS 7 200 -3 3 20 PROCTOR Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 W AD 9 140 -1 1 16 TUCKEY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 2 W KD 9 140 -5 5 15 ROBINSON Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 W AH 8 110 0 0 11 STONEMAN Team 17 PAULL Team 2 E 8D 8 110 0 0 8 MORRISON Team 10 TALL Team 2 E 8D 8 110 -4 4 3 VACHON Team 2 KING Team 2 W AD 8 110 -4 4 9 ROUGHEY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 N 4H 7 100 0 0 4 PERRY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 2 N KS 7 100 3 -3 18 LOVEDAY Team 20 PROCTOR Team 2 S 3S 7 100 1 -1 17 PAULL Team 11 STONEMAN Team 3 N KS 8 100 0 0 14 HARINGTON Team 16 TUCKEY Team 3 W KD 8 50 5 -5 10 TALL Team 8 MORRISON Team 3 W AD 8 50 4 -4 2 KING Team 3 VACHON Team 3 E 8D 8 50 4 -4 19 POWLEY Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 N KS 8 90 0 0 5 ROGERS Team 19 POWLEY Team 1 N 2H 8 90 0 0 13 MADSEN Team 12 RYAN Team 2 N KS 8 90 0 0 12 RYAN Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 N KS 8 90 0 0 1 RIDLEY Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E 5D 8 100 9 -9
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by EW | -2 | 100 | 1 |
2 by NS | = | 90 | 3 |
1 by NS | +1 | 90 | 1 |
3 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
3 by EW | -1 | 50 | 2 |
3 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 2 |
2 by EW | = | -110 | 2 |
2 by EW | = | -110 | 2 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 2 |
3 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
3 by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |