NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 4
Board No: 6
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -630
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 RIDLEY Team 10 TALL Team 4 
W9C 11 650 0 0 2 KING Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 5 
X STH 9 300 8 -8 3 VACHON Team 19 POWLEY Team 4 W9C 10 620 1 -1 4 PERRY Team 8 MORRISON Team 4 W9C 11 650 0 0 5 ROGERS Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 W4S 11 650 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 5 ROGERS Team 4 E9C 11 650 0 0 7 MIDGLEY Team 2 KING Team 4 W9C 11 650 -8 8 8 MORRISON Team 4 PERRY Team 4 WAH 11 650 0 0 9 ROUGHEY Team 12 RYAN Team 4 W9C 11 650 -1 1 10 TALL Team 1 RIDLEY Team 5 W9C 11 650 0 0 11 STONEMAN Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 WAH 11 650 0 0 12 RYAN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 4 EQH 10 620 1 -1 13 MADSEN Team 16 TUCKEY Team 4 WAH 10 620 -9 9 14 HARINGTON Team 11 STONEMAN Team 5 W9C 11 650 0 0 15 ROBINSON Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 W9C 10 620 -3 3 16 TUCKEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 3 W9C 11 200 9 -9 17 PAULL Team 20 PROCTOR Team 4 W9C 11 650 0 0 18 LOVEDAY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 5 X SQD 8 500 3 -3 19 POWLEY Team 3 VACHON Team 4 W9C 11 650 -1 1 20 PROCTOR Team 17 PAULL Team 4 EQH 11 650 0 0
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 3 by EW | +2 | -200 | 1 |
| 5X by NS | -2 | -300 | 1 |
| 5X by NS | -3 | -500 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | = | -620 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | = | -620 | 3 |
| 5 by EW | = | -650 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 9 |