NOOSA WINTER TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 22
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 30
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 HARRIS Team 5 MELLINGS Team 2 
E4D 9 140 -7 7 2 KELLY Team 8 OLSEN Team 2 E6D 8 110 1 -1 3 JAKES Team 10 MCDONALD Team 3 
SKH 9 140 1 -1 4 ANDREW Team 6 MALTBY Team 3 
SKH 8 50 -8 8 5 MELLINGS Team 1 HARRIS Team 3 SKH 9 140 7 -7 6 MALTBY Team 4 ANDREW Team 4 E4D 7 300 8 -8 7 HART Team 16 MCNAMEE Team 2 SKH 9 140 7 -7 8 OLSEN Team 2 KELLY Team 3 E3S 9 140 -1 1 9 WEBBER Team 14 QUIGLEY Team 2 N3C 9 140 6 -6 10 MCDONALD Team 3 JAKES Team 2 SKH 8 110 -1 1 11 ROUGHLEY Team 20 GODDARD Team 3 E4D 8 100 6 -6 12 BECKETT Team 15 MIDGLEY Team 3 E2D 8 100 -3 3 13 HAWKINS Team 18 HARRISON Team 2 
WAD 8 90 1 -1 14 QUIGLEY Team 9 WEBBER Team 2 E2D 8 110 -6 6 15 MIDGLEY Team 12 BECKETT Team 4 EAS 8 200 3 -3 16 MCNAMEE Team 7 HART Team 3 WKD 10 130 -7 7 17 MUSGRAVE Team 19 SMITH Team 4 E2D 7 300 4 -4 18 HARRISON Team 13 HAWKINS Team 2 E5D 8 110 -1 1 19 SMITH Team 17 MUSGRAVE Team 1 N2C 9 140 -4 4 20 GODDARD Team 11 ROUGHLEY Team 3 E8C 9 140 -6 6
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 4 by EW | -3 | 300 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | = | 140 | 2 |
| 2 by NS | +1 | 140 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | +1 | 140 | 1 |
| 1 by NS | +2 | 140 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 110 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 2 |
| 3 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | = | -90 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | = | -110 | 3 |
| 3 by EW | +1 | -130 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | = | -140 | 2 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |