REDLAND GRADED TEAMS - C GRADE - MATCH 1
Board No: 9
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -180
Go to Previous Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 FULCHER Team 7 JOHNMAN Team 7 
E2D 11 200 0 0 2 SOUTER Team 8 NORTHEY Team 4 
S4C 9 50 -8 8 3 WILLIAMS Team 9 LANGDON Team 2 
N4S 8 110 12 -12 4 BENNETT Team 10 DEAVILLE Team 3NT W QS 11 660 -2 2 5 GOSNEY Team 11 WHITE Team 4 S2C 8 100 -9 9 6 BESSELL Team 12 WOODS Team 3NT W QS 11 660 -2 2 7 JOHNMAN Team 1 FULCHER Team 3NT W 5S 7 200 0 0 8 NORTHEY Team 2 SOUTER Team 6 E3D 9 300 8 -8 9 LANGDON Team 3 WILLIAMS Team 5 EQH 11 600 -12 12 10 DEAVILLE Team 4 BENNETT Team 3NT W QS 9 600 2 -2 11 WHITE Team 5 GOSNEY Team 3NT W JS 6 300 9 -9 12 WOODS Team 6 BESSELL Team 5 EAS 11 600 2 -2
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 3NT by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
| 6 by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
| 3NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 7 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 110 | 1 |
| 4 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 4 by NS | -2 | -100 | 1 |
| 3NT by EW | = | -600 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | = | -600 | 2 |
| 3NT by EW | +2 | -660 | 2 |